<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Funding on This Week in Quantum</title><link>https://this-week-in-quantum.org/tags/funding/</link><description>Recent content in Funding on This Week in Quantum</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 10:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://this-week-in-quantum.org/tags/funding/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>This Week in Quantum #26</title><link>https://this-week-in-quantum.org/posts/issue-026/</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 10:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://this-week-in-quantum.org/posts/issue-026/</guid><description>&lt;p>Welcome to issue #26 of &lt;strong>This Week in Quantum&lt;/strong> — a roundup of the most important developments in quantum computing from August 30 to September 6, 2026.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This was one of the busier weeks of the year: a widely publicized &amp;ldquo;quantum advantage&amp;rdquo; claim started getting picked apart in public, Canada made its largest-ever quantum manufacturing investment, Gulf states continued treating quantum computing as industrial policy, and a two-decade-old theoretical prediction about entanglement finally got confirmed in the lab. Below is what happened, with the caveats attached where they matter.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>